Direct representation

The page defines “strategic litigation against government” this way. Strategic means repeated litigation across subject areas. Litigation means civil cases about how legal texts are read. Against means suits against government, not on behalf of it, so opposing counsel are generally government attorneys or lawyers paid by government or a government insurance trust. Government means the United States and its agencies, states and their agencies, counties, school districts, municipalities, and townships.

The page says this kind of support is not messaging, investigation, or lobbying, and that a gift designated for direct representation is not used for those three categories.

It says the work is a way for people and businesses to challenge government for violations of law, alongside other cultural and political action. It says a donor can follow the court cases and see whether that approach is working.

Subject areas on the public page

• Health freedom, including accommodations from vaccination mandates.
• Public schools and universities.
• Election administration, including private money in election offices, voter-roll records, and who writes election rules.
• DEI programs, using the label on the public page.
• Family integrity, including child custody, marital dissolution, child protection, and abortion.
• Economic regulation, including state rules on out-of-state transactions.
• Public land use, including statutory limits on federal executive action.
• Malicious prosecution.
• Taxation, including limits on the power to tax.
• Indigenous peoples, including investigation, apology, ceremony, and reparations.

The public page’s school and election examples are more specific than this list. They are published on the live site. This page keeps the subject areas and does not add claims.